Micromanagement: This management style may lead to micromanagement, which can be highly frustrating for employees.Ineffective team building: Autocratic management often lacks team building, as employees are less likely to work together closely.Lack of employee input: Employees cannot share their thoughts or ideas, leading to frustration.The disadvantages of autocratic management include: This eliminates any confusion and ensures everyone is on the same page. Direct communication: Autocratic managers communicate directly with their employees, providing clear instructions.Effective crisis management: In times of crisis or emergency, autocratic managers are quick to take charge and make crucial decisions.As a result, productivity may increase under this style. They hold team members accountable for meeting these goals on time. Improved productivity: Autocratic leaders outline exactly what is expected of employees when delegating tasks.The advantages of autocratic management are: These bosses also might frequently check on the team's progress to ensure everything is on schedule. Generally, autocratic managers take charge of day-to-day operations and provide each team member with precise instructions. This style hinges upon control and power, with decision-making resting entirely in the hands of one person: the manager. Ineffective crisis management: While affiliative managers are good with people, they may falter in the face of crises requiring immediate attention.Įvery organization may want to consider having an affiliative leader to enhance the workplace.Īutocratic leadership is the opposite of affiliative management.A lack of focus: Some employees require direct and specific leadership and can become stressed by the hands-off management style of this approach.Complacency: When employees receive consistently positive feedback from managers who take an affiliative management approach, they may become less motivated to challenge themselves to grow.
The disadvantages of affiliative management are: